Antibiotic clinical decision support for pneumonia in the ED: A randomized trial

Author:

Williams Derek J.1,Martin Judith M.2,Nian Hui1,Weitkamp Asli O.1,Slagle Jason1,Turer Robert W.3,Suresh Srinivasan2ORCID,Johnson Jakobi1,Stassun Justine1ORCID,Just Shari L.1,Reale Carrie1,Beebe Russ1,Arnold Donald H.1,Antoon James W.1ORCID,Rixe Nancy S.2,Sartori Laura F.4,Freundlich Robert E.1,Ampofo Krow5,Pavia Andrew T.5,Smith Joshua C.1,Weinger Matthew B.1,Zhu Yuwei1,Grijalva Carlos G.1

Affiliation:

1. Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at VUMC Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee USA

2. UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

4. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. University of Utah and Primary Children's Hospital Salt Lake City Utah USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundElectronic health record‐based clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising antibiotic stewardship strategy. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of antibiotic CDS in the pediatric emergency department (ED).ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of antibiotic CDS vs. usual care for promoting guideline‐concordant antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia in the pediatric ED.DesignPragmatic randomized clinical trial.Setting and ParticipantsEncounters for children (6 months‐18 years) with pneumonia presenting to two tertiary care children s hospital EDs in the United States.InterventionCDS or usual care was randomly assigned during 4‐week periods within each site. The CDS intervention provided antibiotic recommendations tailored to each encounter and in accordance with national guidelines.Main Outcome and MeasuresThe primary outcome was exclusive guideline‐concordant antibiotic prescribing within the first 24 h of care. Safety outcomes included time to first antibiotic order, encounter length of stay, delayed intensive care, and 3‐ and 7‐day revisits.Results1027 encounters were included, encompassing 478 randomized to usual care and 549 to CDS. Exclusive guideline‐concordant prescribing did not differ at 24 h (CDS, 51.7% vs. usual care, 53.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.94 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73, 1.20]). In pre‐specified stratified analyses, CDS was associated with guideline‐concordant prescribing among encounters discharged from the ED (74.9% vs. 66.0%; OR 1.53 [95% CI: 1.01, 2.33]), but not among hospitalized encounters. Mean time to first antibiotic was shorter in the CDS group (3.0 vs 3.4 h; p = .024). There were no differences in safety outcomes.ConclusionsEffectiveness of ED‐based antibiotic CDS was greatest among those discharged from the ED. Longitudinal interventions designed to target both ED and inpatient clinicians and to address common implementation challenges may enhance the effectiveness of CDS as a stewardship tool.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Assessment and Diagnosis,Care Planning,Health Policy,Fundamentals and skills,General Medicine,Leadership and Management

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3