Proteomic signatures of physical, cognitive, and imaging outcomes in multiple sclerosis

Author:

Jalaleddini Kian1ORCID,Jakimovski Dejan2ORCID,Keshavan Anisha1,McCurdy Shannon1,Leyden Kelly1,Qureshi Ferhan1,Ghoreyshi Atiyeh1,Bergsland Niels2ORCID,Dwyer Michael G.2,Ramanathan Murali3,Weinstock‐Guttman Bianca4,Benedict Ralph HB2,Zivadinov Robert25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Octave Biosciences Menlo Park California USA

2. Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USA

3. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences State University of New York, Buffalo Buffalo New York USA

4. Jacobs MS Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USA

5. Center for Biomedical Imaging at the Clinical Translational Science Institute University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundA quantitative measurement of serum proteome biomarkers that would associate with disease progression endpoints can provide risk stratification for persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and supplement the clinical decision‐making process.Materials and MethodsIn total, 202 PwMS were enrolled in a longitudinal study with measurements at two time points with an average follow‐up time of 5.4 years. Clinical measures included the Expanded Disability Status Scale, Timed 25‐foot Walk, 9‐Hole Peg, and Symbol Digit Modalities Tests. Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging to determine the volumetric measures of the whole brain, gray matter, deep gray matter, and lateral ventricles. Serum samples were analyzed using a custom immunoassay panel on the Olink™ platform, and concentrations of 18 protein biomarkers were measured. Linear mixed‐effects models and adjustment for multiple comparisons were performed.ResultsSubjects had a significant 55.6% increase in chemokine ligand 20 (9.7 pg/mL vs. 15.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and neurofilament light polypeptide (10.5 pg/mL vs. 11.5 pg/mL, p = 0.003) at the follow‐up time point. Additional changes in CUB domain‐containing protein 1, Contactin 2, Glial fibrillary acidic protein, Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, and Osteopontin were noted but did not survive multiple comparison correction. Worse clinical performance in the 9‐HPT was associated with neurofilament light polypeptide (p = 0.001). Increases in several biomarker candidates were correlated with greater neurodegenerative changes as measured by different brain volumes.ConclusionMultiple proteins, selected from a disease activity test that represent diverse biological pathways, are associated with physical, cognitive, and radiographic outcomes. Future studies should determine the utility of multiple protein assays in routine clinical care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3