Pushing the Boundary of Covalency in Lanthanoid‐Tellurium Bonds: Insights from the Synthesis, Molecular and Electronic Structures of Low‐Coordinate, Monomeric Europium(II) and Ytterbium(II) Tellurolates

Abstract

AbstractOwing to the strict hard/soft dichotomy between the lanthanoids and tellurium atoms, and the strong affinity of lanthanoid ions for high coordination numbers, low‐coordinate, monomeric lanthanoid tellurolate complexes have remained elusive as compared to the lanthanoid complexes with lighter group 16 elements (O, S, and Se). This makes the development of suitable ligand systems for low‐coordinate, monomeric lanthanoid tellurolate complexes an appealing endeavor. In a first report, a series of low‐coordinate, monomeric lanthanoid (Yb, Eu) tellurolate complexes were synthesized by utilizing hybrid organotellurolate ligands containing N‐donor pendant arms. The reaction of bis[2‐((dimethylamino)methyl)phenyl] ditelluride,1and 8,8′diquinolinyl ditelluride,2withLn0metals (Ln=Eu, Yb) resulted in the formation of monomeric complexes [LnII(TeR)2(Solv)2] [R=C6H4‐2‐CH2NMe2] [3:Ln=Eu, Solv=tetrahydrofuran;4:Ln=Eu, Solv=acetonitrile;5:Ln=Yb, Solv=tetrahydrofuran;6:Ln=Yb, Solv=pyridine] and [EuII(TeNC9H6)2(Solv)n] (7: Solv=tetrahydrofuran, n=3;8: Solv=1,2‐dimethoxyethane, n=2), respectively. Complexes3–4and7–8represent the first sets of examples of monomeric europium tellurolate complexes. The molecular structures of complexes3–8are validated by single–crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. The electronic structures of these complexes were investigated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, which revealed appreciable covalency between the tellurolate ligands and lanthanoids.