The effect of self‐management techniques on relevant outcomes in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Scholz C.1ORCID,Schmigalle P.1ORCID,Plessen C. Y.1ORCID,Liegl G.1ORCID,Vajkoczy P.2ORCID,Prasser F.3ORCID,Rose M.14ORCID,Obbarius A.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

2. Department for Neurosurgery with Pediatric Neurosurgery, Center for Neurology, Neurosurgery und Psychiatry Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

3. Center of Health Data Sciences Berlin Institut of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany

4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Medical School University of Massachusetts Boston Massachusetts USA

5. BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy Berlin Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectiveAmong many treatment approaches for chronic low back pain (CLBP), self‐management techniques are becoming increasingly important. The aim of this paper was to (a) provide an overview of existing digital self‐help interventions for CLBP and (b) examine the effect of these interventions in reducing pain intensity, pain catastrophizing and pain disability.Databases and Data TreatmentFollowing the PRISMA guideline, a systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL and Cochrane databases. We included randomized controlled trials from the last 10 years that examined the impact of digital self‐management interventions on at least one of the three outcomes in adult patients with CLBP (duration ≥3 months). The meta‐analysis was based on random‐effects models. Standardized tools were used to assess the risk of bias (RoB) for each study and the quality of evidence for each outcome.ResultsWe included 12 studies (n = 1545). A small but robust and statistically significant pooled effect was found on pain intensity (g = 0.24; 95% CI [0.09, 0.40], k = 12) and pain disability (g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.27, 0.59], k = 11). The effect on pain catastrophizing was not significant (g = 0.38; 95% CI [−0.31, 1.06], k = 4). The overall effect size including all three outcomes was g = 0.33 (95% CI [0.21, 0.44], k = 27). The RoB of the included studies was mixed. The quality of evidence was moderate or high.ConclusionIn summary, we were able to substantiate recent evidence that digital self‐management interventions are effective in the treatment of CLBP. Given the heterogeneity of interventions, further research should aim to investigate which patients benefit most from which approach.SignificanceThis meta‐analysis examines the effect of digital self‐management techniques in patients with CLBP. The results add to the evidence that digital interventions can help patients reduce their pain intensity and disability. A minority of studies point towards the possibility that digital interventions can reduce pain catastrophizing. Future research should further explore which patients benefit most from these kinds of interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3