Affiliation:
1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of California–Davis Sacramento California USA
2. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Nevada–Las Vegas Las Vegas Nevada USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (18FDG‐PET/CT) in detecting second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients with treatment naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Data SourcesMedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus searched from 1946 to December 2022.Review MethodsStudies reporting the performance of 18FDG‐PET/CT in patients with treatment‐naïve, index HNSCC for detection of SPMs were included. The reference standard was histopathology, clinical follow‐up over the duration of study, and other imaging modalities. Multiple investigators completed depth full‐text analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis guidelines were followed. Methodologic and diagnostic accuracy data were abstracted independently by multiple investigators. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool independently. Bivariate random‐effects model meta‐analysis and multivariable meta‐regression modeling were used.ResultsSeventeen studies examining 4624 patients with a total of 475 SPMs were included in the final analysis. Eleven studies were found to be at low risk for bias, while the rest were in the high‐risk category. 18FDG‐PET/CT demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49‐0.88) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98‐1.00) in detecting SPMs. Further subsite analysis revealed varied diagnostic performance across different anatomical regions, with sensitivity and specificity of esophageal SPMs being 0.47 (0.30‐0.64) and 0.99 (0.98‐1.00), and sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (0.73‐0.94) and 0.99 (0.98‐1.00) for head and neck SPMs. Finally, this imaging modality showed sensitivity and specificity of 0.92 (0.84‐0.96) and 0.99 (0.98‐1.00) for lung SPMs.ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest varied accuracy of 18FDG‐PET/CT in detecting SPMs during initial workup for HNSCC, highlighting the importance of screening modalities such as esophagoscopy in high‐risk patients.