Technical note: Can photon‐counting CT improve PET/CT's quantitative accuracy?

Author:

Hamill James1ORCID,Birge Noah1,O'Doherty Jim23ORCID,Nye Jonathon4,Elojeimy Saeed4

Affiliation:

1. Siemens Medical Solutions USA Knoxville Tennessee USA

2. CT R&D Collaborations Siemens Medical Solutions USA Malvern Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

4. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Department of Nuclear Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLinear attenuation coefficients (LACs) in positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) are derived from CT scans that utilize energy‐integrating detectors (EID‐CT). These LACs are inaccurate when iodine contrast has been injected. Photon counting detector CT (PCD‐CT) may be able to improve the accuracy.PurposeTo investigate whether PCD‐CT can improve PET/CT quantitative accuracy.MethodsTwo experiments were performed: one with CT only and one that combined PET and CT. The first experiment used an electron density phantom whose inserts were imaged with EID‐CT and PCD‐CT. The inserts simulated normal human tissues, including bone and iodinated blood. In the case of PCD‐CT, virtual‐monoenergetic images at 190 keV were created. LACs were derived in each case and compared against known values. For inserts with iodine, more accurate LACs were expected with PCD‐CT. The second experiment involved a custom PET phantom with various materials simulating human tissues (blood, iodinated blood, and bone) and 18F radioactivity. Data were first acquired with an EID‐CT‐based PET/CT system and then separately in a PCD‐CT system without PET. PET images were reconstructed using LAC from EID‐CT and PCD‐CT. PET image values were compared against known activity values using recovery coefficients (RC).ResultsIn the first experiment, LAC based on EID‐CT were in error by as much as 18%, whereas the corresponding PCD‐CT based measurements were within 3%. In the second experiment, minimum, maximum, and mean RC were (96.1%, 115.4%, and 103.8%) for the EID‐CT method, and (95.8%, 105.5%, and 101.0%) for the PCD‐CT method. The consistency of PET images in body and head orientations was improved.ConclusionsPCD‐CT can acquire the information needed for accurate LAC for PET reconstruction in a single spiral acquisition.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference16 articles.

1. Photon-counting CT review

2. Technical Basics and Clinical Benefits of Photon-Counting CT

3. Method for transforming CT images for attenuation correction in PET/CT imaging

4. X-ray attenuation coefficients (total cross sections) :

5. XCOM: Photon Cross Sections Database.National Institute of Standard and Technology. Accessed March 18 2024.https://www.nist.gov/pml/xcom‐photon‐cross‐sections‐database

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3