Outcomes of fetal reduction versus expectant management in dichorionic triamniotic triplets

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets who underwent fetal reduction (FR) to singletons or twins with those managed expectantly.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of DCTA triplets with three living fetuses at 11–14 weeks over a 7‐year period. Pregnancy outcomes were compared following different management strategies.ResultsOf 108 included patients, 22 underwent expectant management (EM), 28 were reduced to dichorionic diamniotic twins, and 58 to singletons. The median gestational age at birth for EM, FR to twins, and singletons was 33.1 weeks, 37.0 weeks, and 38.6 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001). Prematurity before 37 and 34 weeks was less common following FR to singletons and twins than in ongoing triplets (18.9%, 46.2% and 90.5%, P < 0.001; 13.2%, 26.9% and 57.1%, P < 0.001). Neonatal birth weight was higher in triplets reduced to singletons and twins compared with EM cases (3140g, 2315g, and 1860g, P < 0.001). However, rates of miscarriage, pregnancies with ≥1 survivor, maternal complications, and adverse neonatal outcomes were comparable among the three groups.ConclusionsIn our experience, FR in DCTA triplets could reduce prematurity risk compared to EM, but it confers no survival advantage. Fetal reduction to singletons may result in more favorable outcomes than those reduced to dichorionic twins.