Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge Massachusetts USA
2. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology Sarriguren Navarra Spain
3. ReNew Power Private Limited Gurugram Haryana India
4. Ørsted Washington, DC USA
Abstract
AbstractWind speed and direction variations across the rotor affect power production. As utility‐scale turbines extend higher into the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) with larger rotor diameters and hub heights, they increasingly encounter more complex wind speed and direction variations. We assess three models for power production that account for wind speed and direction shear. Two are based on actuator disc representations, and the third is a blade element representation. We also evaluate the predictions from a standard power curve model that has no knowledge of wind shear. The predictions from each model, driven by wind profile measurements from a profiling LiDAR, are compared to concurrent power measurements from an adjacent utility‐scale wind turbine. In the field measurements of the utility‐scale turbine, discrete combinations of speed and direction shear induce changes in power production of −19% to +34% relative to the turbine power curve for a given hub height wind speed. Positive speed shear generally corresponds to over‐performance and increasing magnitudes of direction shear to greater under‐performance, relative to the power curve. Overall, the blade element model produces both higher correlation and lower error relative to the other models, but its quantitative accuracy depends on induction and controller sub‐models. To further assess the influence of complex, non‐monotonic wind profiles, we also drive the models with best‐fit power law wind speed profiles and linear wind direction profiles. These idealized inputs produce qualitative and quantitative differences in power predictions from each model, demonstrating that time‐varying, non‐monotonic wind shear affects wind power production.
Funder
Chevron
National Science Foundation
Reference56 articles.
1. WiserR BolingerM HoenB et al.Land‐Based Wind Market Report: 2022 Edition. Rep. DOE/GO‐102022‐5763 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information;2022. Online.
2. MusialW SpitsenP DuffyP et al.Offshore Wind Market Report: 2022 Edition. Rep. DOE/GO‐102022‐5765 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information;2022. Online.
3. Analysis of Vertical Wind Shear Effects on Offshore Wind Energy Prediction Accuracy Applying Rotor Equivalent Wind Speed and the Relationship with Atmospheric Stability
4. Grand challenges in the science of wind energy
5. On the Classification of Vertical Wind Shear as Directional Shear versus Speed Shear