The evolving genetic etiology of conotruncal anomalies

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic yield of genetic testing for antenatally detected conotruncal defects.MethodThis was a retrospective analysis of all antenatally detected cases of conotruncal anomalies over a 4‐year period. Patients were offered antenatal and postnatal genetic testing including QF‐PCR, microarray and exome sequencing (ES) antenatally or genome sequencing (GS) postnatally on a case‐by‐case basis.ResultsThere were 301 cases included. Overall, there were pathogenic genetic findings in 27.6% of the cases tested (53/192). The commonest finding was 22q11.21 deletion (20/192 cases, 10.4%), followed by trisomy 21 (6/192, 3.1%). There were 249 cases of isolated conotruncal anomalies, of which 59.8% (149/249) had genetic testing and 22.8% (34/149) had pathogenic findings. ES/GS was performed in five cases with no pathogenic findings. There were 52 cases of non‐isolated contruncal anomalies, of which 82.7% (43/52) had genetic testing. ES/GS was performed in 11 cases in this group and increased the yield of clinically significant diagnoses from 32.6% (14/43) to 44.2% (19/43).ConclusionGenetic abnormalities are present in over one quarter of cases of antenatally detected conotruncal anomalies. The commonest abnormality is 22q11.21 deletion. Exome sequencing or genome sequencing leads to a significant increase in genetic diagnosis in non‐isolated cases.