Anaesthetic mortality in cats: A worldwide analysis and risk assessment

Author:

Redondo José I.1ORCID,Martínez‐Taboada Fernando23ORCID,Viscasillas Jaime4ORCID,Doménech Luis5ORCID,Marti‐Scharfhausen Reyes6,Hernández‐Magaña Eva Z.1ORCID,Otero Pablo E.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal Facultad de Veterinaria Universidad Cardenal Herrera‐CEU Valencia Spain

2. Sydney School of Veterinary Science University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. 3A Animal Anaesthesia and Analgesia Victoria Australia

4. Anicura Valencia Sur Hospital Veterinario Valencia Spain

5. Departamento de Matemáticas Física y Ciencias Tecnológicas, Escuela Superior de Enseñanzas Técnicas, Universidad Cardenal Herrera‐CEU Valencia Spain

6. Anicura Indautxu Hospital Veterinario Bilbao Spain

7. Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatient safety is essential in small animal anaesthesia. This study aimed to assess anaesthesia‐related deaths in cats worldwide, identify risk and protective factors and provide insights for clinical practice.MethodsA prospective multicentre cohort study of 14,962 cats from 198 veterinary centres across different countries was conducted. Data on anaesthesia‐related deaths, from premedication up to 48 hours postextubation, were collected. Logistic regression was used to analyse patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, procedure type and anaesthetic drugs.ResultsThe anaesthesia‐related mortality was 0.63%, with 74.5% of deaths occurring postoperatively. Cats with cachexia, a higher ASA status or who underwent abdominal, orthopaedic/neurosurgical or thoracic procedures exhibited elevated mortality. Mechanical ventilation use was associated with increased mortality. Mortality odds were reduced by the use of alpha2‐agonist sedatives, pure opioids in premedication and locoregional techniques.LimitationsLimitations include non‐randomised sampling, potential biases, unquantified response rates, subjective death cause classification and limited variable analysis.ConclusionsAnaesthetic mortality in cats is significant, predominantly postoperative. Risk factors include cachexia, higher ASA status, specific procedures and mechanical ventilation. Protective factors include alpha2‐agonist sedatives, pure opioids and locoregional techniques. These findings can help improve anaesthesia safety and outcomes. However, further research is required to improve protocols, enhance data quality and minimise risks.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3