Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium‐68 positron range correction

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe distance traveled by the positron before annihilation with an electron, the so‐called positron range, negatively effects the positron emission tomography (PET) image quality for radionuclides emitting high‐energy positrons such as Gallium‐68 (68Ga).PurposeIn this study, the effect of a tissue‐independent positron range correction for Gallium‐68 (68Ga‐PRC) was investigated based on phantom measurements. The effect of the 68Ga‐PRC was also explored in four patients.MethodsThe positron range distribution profile of 68Ga in water was generated via Monte Carlo simulation. That profile was mapped to a spatially invariant 3D convolution kernel which was incorporated in the OSEM and Q.Clear reconstruction algorithms to perform the 68Ga‐PRC. In addition, each reconstruction method included point spread function (PSF) modeling and time‐of‐flight information. For both Fluorine‐18 (18F) and 68Ga, the NEMA IQ phantom was filled with a sphere‐to‐background ratio of 10:1 and scanned with the GE Discovery MI 5R PET/CT system. Standard non‐positron range correction (PRC) reconstructions were performed for both radionuclides, while also PRC reconstructions were performed for 68Ga. Reconstructions parameters (OSEM: number of updates, Q.Clear: beta value) were adapted to achieve similar noise levels between the corresponding reconstructions. The effect of 68Ga‐PRC was assessed for both OSEM and Q.Clear reconstructions and compared to non‐PRC reconstructions for 68Ga and 18F in terms of image contrast, noise, recovery coefficient (RC), and spatial resolution. For the clinical validation, 68Ga‐labeled prostate‐specific membrane antigen (68Ga‐PSMA) and 68Ga‐DOTATOC PET scans were included of two patients each. For each PET scan, patients were injected with 1.5 MBq/kg of 68Ga‐PSMA or 68Ga‐DOTATOC and the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was calculated and compared to the non‐PRC reconstructions.ResultsFor OSEM reconstructions, including the 68Ga‐PRC improved the RC by 9.4% (3.7%–19.3%) and spatial resolution by 21.7% (4.6 mm vs. 3.6 mm) for similar noise levels. For Q.Clear reconstructions, 68Ga‐PRC modeling improved the RC by 6.7% (2.8%–10.5%) and spatial resolution by 15.3% (5.9 mm vs. 5.0 mm) while obtaining similar noise levels. In the patient data, the use of 68Ga‐PRC enhanced the CNR by 13.2%.ConclusionsIncluding 68Ga‐PRC in the PET reconstruction enhanced the image quality of 68Ga PET data compared to the standard non‐PRC reconstructions for similar noise levels. Limited patient results also supported this improvement.