American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement part 2: Postoperative precautions and management principles following endoscopic skull base surgery

Author:

Douglas Jennifer E.1ORCID,Adappa Nithin D.1,Choby Garret2ORCID,Levine Corinna G.3,Rabinowitz Mindy R.4,Sindwani Raj5,Wang Eric W.2ORCID,Woodworth Bradford A.6ORCID,Kuan Edward C.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Health System Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery Thomas Jefferson University Health System Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

6. Department of Otolaryngology University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

7. Departments of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery University of California Irvine California USA

Abstract

AbstractThe goal of this American Rhinologic Society expert practice statement (EPS) is to summarize the best available evidence regarding postoperative precautions for patients following endoscopic skull base surgery for intradural pathology. These topics include the administration of postoperative nasal hygiene; patient mobilization and activity level; the resumption of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea; and the timing and capacity with which a patient may be subjected to barotrauma, such as air travel postoperatively. This EPS was developed following the recommended methodology and approval process as previously outlined. Given the diverse practices and limited agreement on the accepted principles regarding postoperative precautions for patients following skull base surgery, this EPS seeks to summarize the existing literature and provide clinically relevant guidance to bring clarity to these differing practice patterns. Following a modified Delphi approach, four statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Because of the paucity of literature on these topics, these statements represent a summation of the limited literature and the experts’ opinions. These statements and the accompanying evidence are summarized below, along with an assessment of future needs.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3