What are the Key Phenomenological Clues to Diagnose Functional Tic‐Like Behaviors in the Pandemic Era?

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFunctional tic‐like behaviors (FTLBs) can be difficult to distinguish from tics.ObjectivesTo describe the phenomenology of FTLBs in youth and assess the movements and vocalizations most suggestive of the diagnosis.MethodsWe compared the phenomenology of tics between youth (<20 yr) with FTLBs and with primary tics from our Registry in Calgary, Canada.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty‐six youths were included: 195 with primary tics (75% males; mean age: 10.8 yr) and 41 with FTLBs (98% females; 16.1 yr). In the bivariate models, FTLBs were most associated with copropraxia (OR = 15.5), saying words (OR = 14.5), coprolalia (OR = 13.1), popping (OR = 11.0), whistling (OR = 9.8), simple head movements (OR = 8.6), and self‐injurious behaviors (OR = 6.9). In the multivariable model, FTLBs were still associated with saying words (OR = 13.5) and simple head movements (OR = 6.3). Only 12.2% of youth with FTLBs had throat clearing tics (OR = 0.2).ConclusionsThis study shall help physicians diagnose youth with FTLBs according to the presence/association of specific movements and vocalizations.