Comparison of the applicability of electromembrane extraction and liquid‐phase microextraction for extraction of non‐polar basic drugs from different biological samples: Using clozapine as the model analyte

Author:

Xiong Jianhua1,Tian Linxin1,Shen Xiantao2,Huang Chuixiu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forensic Medicine Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

2. State Key Laboratory of Environment Health (Incubation) Key Laboratory of Environment and Health Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health (Wuhan), Ministry of Environmental Protection, School of Public Health, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China

Abstract

Understanding and comparing the applicability of electromembrane extraction (EME) and liquid‐phase microextraction (LPME) is crucial for selecting an appropriate microextraction approach. In this work, EME and LPME based on supported liquid membranes were compared using biological samples, including whole blood, urine, saliva, and liver tissue. After optimization, efficient EME and LPME of clozapine from four biological samples were achieved. EME provided higher recovery and faster mass transfer for blood and liver tissue than LPME. These advantages were attributed to the electric field disrupting clozapine binding to interfering substances. For urine and saliva, EME demonstrated similar recoveries while achieving faster mass transfer rates. Finally, efficient EME and LPME were validated and evaluated combined with liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). The coefficient of determination of all methods was greater than 0.999, and all methods showed acceptable reproducibility (≤14%), accuracy (90%–110%), and matrix effect (85%–112%). For liver and blood with high viscosity and complex matrices, EME‐LC‐MS/MS provided better sensitivity than LPME‐LC‐MS/MS. The above results indicated that both EME and LPME could be used to isolate non‐polar basic drugs from different biological samples, although EME demonstrated higher recovery rates for liver tissue and blood.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3