Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Author:

,Degiuli M1,Sasako M2,Ponti A3,Vendrame A1,Tomatis M3,Mazza C1,Borasi A1,Capussotti L4,Fronda G5,Morino M6,Ferri V6,Rebecchi F6,Garino M7,Viganò L4,Scaglione D8,Locatelli L9,Teggia P Mello10

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

2. Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan

3. Reference Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention of Cancer in Piedmont (CPO Piemonte), Turin, Italy

4. Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy

5. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

6. Digestive, Colorectal and Oncological Surgery, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

7. Division of General Surgery, Ospedale E. Agnelli, Pinerolo, Italy

8. Division of General Surgery, Ospedale Martini, Turin, Italy

9. Division of General Surgery, Maria Pia Hospital (GMV), Turin, Italy

10. Division of General Surgery, Ospedale S Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background It is still unclear whether D2 lymphadenectomy improves the survival of patients with gastric cancer and should therefore be performed routinely or selectively. The aim of this multicentre randomized trial was to compare D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods Between June 1998 and December 2006, patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were assigned randomly to either D1 or D2 gastrectomy. Intraoperative randomization was implemented centrally by telephone. Primary outcome was overall survival; secondary endpoints were disease-specific survival, morbidity and postoperative mortality. Results A total of 267 eligible patients were allocated to either D1 (133 patients) or D2 (134) resection. Morbidity (12·0 versus 17·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·183) and operative mortality (3·0 versus 2·2 per cent; P = 0·725) rates did not differ significantly between the groups. Median follow-up was 8·8 (range 4·5–13·1) years for surviving patients and 2·4 (0·2–11·9) years for those who died, and was not different in the two treatment arms. There was no difference in the overall 5-year survival rate (66·5 versus 64·2 per cent for D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy respectively; P = 0·695). Subgroup analyses showed a 5-year disease-specific survival benefit for patients with pathological tumour (pT) 1 disease in the D1 group (98 per cent versus 83 per cent for the D2 group; P = 0·015), and for patients with pT2–4 status and positive lymph nodes in the D2 group (59 per cent versus 38 per cent for the D1 group; P = 0·055). Conclusion No difference was found in overall 5-year survival between D1 and D2 resection. Subgroup analyses suggest that D2 lymphadenectomy may be a better choice in patients with advanced disease and lymph node metastases. Registration number: ISRCTN11154654 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 255 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3