Automated quantification of the pulmonary vasculature in pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Author:

Zhai Zhiwei1ORCID,Boon Gudula J. A. M.2,Staring Marius1,van Dam Lisette F.2,Kroft Lucia J. M.3,Hernández Girón Irene1,Ninaber Maarten K.4,Bogaard Harm Jan5,Meijboom Lilian J.6,Vonk Noordegraaf Anton5,Huisman Menno V.2,Klok Frederikus A.2,Stoel Berend C.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

2. Department of Medicine ‐ Thrombosis and Hemostasis Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

3. Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

4. Department of Pulmonology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

5. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

6. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractThe shape and distribution of vascular lesions in pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are different. We investigated whether automated quantification of pulmonary vascular morphology and densitometry in arteries and veins imaged by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) could distinguish PE from CTEPH. We analyzed CTPA images from a cohort of 16 PE patients, 6 CTEPH patients, and 15 controls. Pulmonary vessels were extracted with a graph‐cut method, and separated into arteries and veins using deep‐learning classification. Vascular morphology was quantified by the slope (α) and intercept (β) of the vessel radii distribution. To quantify lung perfusion defects, the median pulmonary vascular density was calculated. By combining these measurements with densities measured in parenchymal areas, pulmonary trunk, and descending aorta, a static perfusion curve was constructed. All separate quantifications were compared between the three groups. No vascular morphology differences were detected in contrast to vascular density values. The median vascular density (interquartile range) was −567 (113), −452 (95), and −470 (323) HU, for the control, PE, and CTEPH group. The static perfusion curves showed different patterns between groups, with a statistically significant difference in aorta‐pulmonary trunk gradient between the PE and CTEPH groups (p = 0.008). In this proof of concept study, not vasculature morphology but densities differentiated between patients of three groups. Further technical improvements are needed to allow for accurate differentiation between PE and CTEPH, which in this study was only possible statistically by measuring the density gradient between aorta and pulmonary trunk.

Funder

Hartstichting

Merck Sharp and Dohme

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3