AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management

Author:

Verduzco‐Gutierrez Monica1ORCID,Raghavan Preeti2,Pruente Jessica3,Moon Daniel4,List Cassandra M.5,Hornyak Joseph Edward3,Gul Fatma6,Deshpande Supreet78,Biffl Susan9,Al Lawati Zainab8ORCID,Alfaro Abraham10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland USA

3. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Jefferson Moss‐Magee Rehabilitation Hospital Elkins Park Pennsylvania USA

5. Brooks Rehabilitation Hospital Jacksonville Florida USA

6. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

7. Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Gillette Children's Hospital St.Paul Minnesota USA

8. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

9. Division Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Orthopedic Surgery UCSD Rady Children's Hospital San Diego California USA

10. Rehabilitation Medicine AtlantiCare Health Services, Inc., Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Atlantic City New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) conducted a comprehensive review in 2021 to identify opportunities for enhancing the care of adult and pediatric patients with spasticity. A technical expert panel (TEP) was convened to develop consensus‐based practice recommendations aimed at addressing gaps in spasticity care.ObjectiveTo develop consensus‐based practice recommendations to identify and address gaps in spasticity care.MethodsThe Spasticity TEP engaged in a 16‐month virtual meeting process, focusing on formulating search terms, refining research questions, and conducting a structured evidence review. Evidence quality was assessed by the AAPM&R Evidence, Quality and Performance Committee (EQPC), and a modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on recommendation statements and evidence grading. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) guided the rating of individual studies and the strength of recommendations.ResultsThe TEP approved five recommendations for spasticity management and five best practices for assessment and management, with one recommendation unable to be graded due to evidence limitations. Best practices were defined as widely accepted components of care, while recommendations required structured evidence reviews and grading. The consensus guidance statement represents current best practices and evidence‐based treatment options, intended for use by PM&R physicians caring for patients with spasticity.ConclusionThis consensus guidance provides clinicians with practical recommendations for spasticity assessment and management based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. Clinical judgment should be exercised, and recommendations tailored to individual patient needs, preferences, and risk profiles. The accompanying table summarizes the best practice recommendations for spasticity assessment and management, reflecting principles with little controversy in care delivery.

Funder

American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3