Electrodiagnostic reporting preferences of referring physicians: An exploratory survey

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction/AimsElectrodiagnostic (EDX) studies play a crucial role in the evaluation of patients with peripheral nervous system disorders. Accurate and succinct communication of test results is critical to patient safety and clinical decision‐making. The objective of this study was to explore EDX reporting preferences of referring physicians to improve quality of communication and patient care.MethodsAn online survey was developed, and a purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit physicians in the authors' professional networks. Quantitative and qualitative survey data underwent frequency and thematic analyses, respectively.ResultsThere were 40 respondents, including: 21 non‐surgical specialists, 12 surgical specialists, and 7 family physicians. Sections rated as most critical were diagnostic impression (97%) and summary/interpretation (72%). Only 18% reported numeric data as critical to their needs, preferring this data to be formatted as bullet points or tables without nerve conduction study waveforms. Regarding the format of the data summary and diagnostic impression sections, the majority of respondents preferred bullet points rather than paragraphs.DiscussionThe results of this exploratory survey suggest that physicians who refer patients for EDX studies prefer reports that emphasize the interpretation of EDX data and a clear diagnostic impression, particularly in bullet point format. This project highlights important preferences and how they compare to recommended reporting guidelines, which may help improve communication and ultimately patient care. Future efforts should explore larger sample sizes with all key stakeholders in the EDX process to better understand reporting styles and preferences with greater nuance and context.