Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence‐based intervention: A mixed‐methods study

Author:

Conley Claire C.1ORCID,Ryba Marlena M.2,Brothers Brittany M.3,Lo Stephen B.4,Andersen Barbara L.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology Georgetown University Medical Center Washington District of Columbia USA

2. Maimonides Cancer Center Brooklyn New York USA

3. Department of Psychiatry Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center Indianapolis Indiana USA

4. Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Psychology The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAdaptations are intentional modifications maximizing the fit of an evidence‐based intervention (EBI) in new context. Little is known about EBI adaptation within psychosocial oncology. Guided by the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications‐Enhanced (FRAME), this mixed‐methods study describes oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI and examines the relationship between planned adaptations and longitudinal EBI usage.MethodsProviders (N = 128) were social workers (47%) and psychologists (40%) practicing in community settings (44%) or academic medical centers (41%). They attended a 3‐day training on a multicomponent psychosocial oncology EBI, the Biobehavioral Intervention (BBI). During training, providers prepared an “adaptation plan” describing necessary adaptations to BBI and rationales for change. Qualitative data from adaptation plans were analyzed using directed content analysis. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between adaptation characteristics (number, similarity to the manualized BBI) and EBI usage across 12 months post‐training.ResultsThree sets of qualitative themes reflecting FRAME elements emerged: (1) content modifications (e.g., shortening/condensing, selecting elements, adding/removing elements); (2) contextual changes (e.g., alternative group formats); and (3) reasons for adaptations (e.g., organization/setting, provider, and recipient factors). Neither number of adaptations nor adaptation similarity were associated with BBI usage across 12 months post‐training.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI. Planned adaptations did not increase usage, but importantly they did not decrease usage. The adaptation process enabled providers to make thoughtful adaptation choices, with implementation successful irrespective of setting constraints.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Oncology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference30 articles.

1. Adapting interventions to new contexts—the ADAPT guidance;Moore G;BMJ,2021

2. Implementing evidence‐based treatment protocols: Flexibility within fidelity.

3. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.Optimal Resources for Cancer Care: 2020 Standards.2023https://accreditation.facs.org/accreditationdocuments/CoC/Standards/Optimal_Resources_for_Cancer_Care_Feb_2023.pdf

4. Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3