Is shockwave therapy effective in the management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Harding Dan1ORCID,Cameron Lee1,Monga Aastha2,Winter Sara2

Affiliation:

1. Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Caerleon UK

2. School of Allied Health Professions Keele University Keele UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEvidence is lacking for the efficacy of shockwave therapy (SWT) in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS).AimTo investigate the efficacy of SWT on pain and function in the management of GTPS.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases and grey literature was conducted up to May 2023. Studies utilising SWT on adults for GTPS, providing measures of pain and/or function at baseline and at follow‐up were considered for inclusion. Meta‐analysis was undertaken using converted pain and functional outcomes. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias, and assigned a level of evidence as per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria.ResultsTwelve articles (n = 1121 subjects) were included, including five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and seven non‐RCTs. No statistical differences were observed for pain over time f(1,5) = 1.349 (p = 0.298) or between SWT and control f(1,5) = 1.782 (p = 0.238). No significant differences in functional outcomes in short‐ (H = 2.591, p = 0.181) and medium‐term follow‐up (H = 0.189, p = 0.664) were identified between SWT and control. Moderate magnitude treatment effects for pain (Hedges‐G [HG] 0.71) favouring SWT groups over control was identified, decreasing to low for function (HG 0.20). Further pain and functional treatment effects were identified at higher magnitudes across follow‐up time‐points in SWT groups compared to control.ConclusionModerate‐quality evidence demonstrated no statistically significant improvements in pain and function post‐SWT compared to control. Low‐quality evidence established clinical improvements throughout all included studies favouring SWT over control. Consequently, owing to relatively low incidence of side effects, SWT should be considered a viable option for the management of GTPS. Issues with both clinical and statistical heterogeneity of studies and during meta‐analysis require consideration, and more robust RCTs are recommended if the efficacy of SWT for the management of GTPS is to be comprehensively determined.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference79 articles.

1. Short- and Intermediate-Term Results of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy

2. Minimally clinical important difference of the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment‐Gluteal (VISA‐G) questionnaire, among male patients with gluteal tendinopathy;Alzahrani H. J.;Journal of Physical Therapy Science,2019

3. Effectiveness of Radial Shockwave Therapy in Calcific and Non-Calcific Tendinopathy of the Shoulder: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3