O‐RADS MRI SCORE: An Essential First‐Step Tool for the Characterization of Adnexal Masses

Author:

Thomassin‐Naggara I.12,Dabi Y.3,Florin M.1,Saltel‐Fulero A.4,Manganaro L.5,Bazot M.1,Razakamanantsoa L.12

Affiliation:

1. Assistante Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Radiology Imaging and Interventional Radiology (IRIS), Tenon Hospital, APHP Sorbonne University, 75005, Paris Paris France

2. Saint‐Antoine Research Cancer Center Sorbonne University Paris France

3. Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Tenon Hospital Paris France

4. Department of Radiology Georges‐Pompidou European Hospital, APHP Paris France

5. University Sapienza Rome Italy

Abstract

The ovarian‐adnexal reporting and data system on magnetic resonance imaging (O‐RADS MRI) score is now a well‐established tool to characterize pelvic gynecological masses based on their likelihood of malignancy. The main added value of O‐RADS MRI over O‐RADS US is to correctly reclassify lesions that were considered suspicious on US as benign on MRI. The crucial issue when characterizing an adnexal mass is to determine the presence/absence of solid tissue and thus need to perform gadolinium injection. O‐RADS MR score was built on a multivariate analysis and must be applied as a step‐by‐step analysis: 1) Is the mass an adnexal mass? 2) Is there an associated peritoneal carcinomatosis? 3) Is there any significant amount of fatty content? 4) Is there any wall enhancement? 5) Is there any internal enhancement? 6) When an internal enhancement is detected, does the internal enhancement correspond to solid tissue or not? 7) Is the solid tissue malignant? With its high value to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses and its high reproducibility, the O‐RADS MRI score could be a valuable tool for timely referral of a patient to an expert center for the treatment of ovarian cancers. Finally, to make a precise diagnosis allowing optimal personalized treatment, the radiologist in gynecological imaging will combine the O‐RADS MRI score with many other clinical, biological, and other MR criteria to suggest a pathological hypothesis.Level of Evidence5Technical Efficacy Stage3.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3