Crisis management and ethical expertise: The role of ethics advice during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Germany

Author:

Sommer Theresa1ORCID,Strassheim Holger1,Wenzel Lars1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sociology Bielefeld University Bielefeld Germany

Abstract

AbstractThe COVID‐19 crisis posed challenges for policy‐makers, experts, and citizens alike. Current research often focuses on the interlinkage between scientific expertise and political decision‐making, but ethical expertise remains largely overlooked. This paper argues that multiple logics of science‐policy interaction and ethics advice exist, especially in times of crisis. It contributes to the debate on crisis management by explaining why ethical expertise is sometimes described as a technocratic development and other times as a political instrumentalization of science. We argue that these seemingly diametrically opposed claims are not necessarily a contradiction but that they can be explained by understanding the underlying logics of how ethics advice is formulated and used to advise policy‐makers. The paper focuses on the role of ethics and expertise in pandemic governance in Germany, based on an analysis of policy documents and workshops with ethical experts and members of organizations relevant to the German COVID response. The aim is to understand how epistemic and ethical claims are linked, reconstruct the underlying political and temporal logics, and identify when ethical dilemmas and controversies arise and become (in)visible. A clearer understanding of these logics is needed to improve national crisis response and governance during future crises.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Administration

Reference77 articles.

1. Ahvenharju Sanna MikkoHalonen SusanneUusitalo VeikkoLaunis andMariHjelt.2006. Comparative Analysis of Opinions Produced by National Ethics Councils. Contract No RTD‐C3‐2004‐TOR1 Final Report.

2. Smart Thinking, Lockdown and Covid‐19: Implications for Public Policy;Altman Morris;Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy,2020

3. The new focus on the policy capacity of the federal government

4. Taming Deep Uncertainty: The Potential of Pragmatist Principles for Understanding and Improving Strategic Crisis Management

5. Perspektivität durch Verfahren. Zur Funktion des Deutschen Ethikrats

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3