Affiliation:
1. University of the West of Scotland Scotland UK
Abstract
AbstractAfter a period of self‐regulation, countries around the world began to implement regulations for the removal of terrorist content from tech platforms. However, much of this regulation has been criticised for a variety of reasons, most prominently for concerns of infringing free speech and creating unfair burdens for smaller platforms. In addition to this, regulation is heavily centred around content moderation, however, fails to consider or address the psychosocial risks it poses to human content moderators. This paper argues that where regulation has been heavily criticised yet continues to inspire similar regulation a new regulatory approach is required. The aim of this paper is to undertake an introductory examination of the use of a social regulation approach in three other industries (environmental protection, consumer protection and occupational health and safety) to learn and investigate new regulatory avenues that could be applied to the development of new regulation that seeks to counter terrorist content on tech platforms and is concerned with the safety of content moderators.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Health Policy,Public Administration,Health (social science)
Reference90 articles.
1. Article 19. (2017). Germany: The act to improve enforcement of the law in social networks. Retrieved November 12 2019 fromhttps://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/170901-Legal-Analysis-German-NetzDG-Act.pdf
2. ISIS's clash of civilizations: Constructing the ‘west’ in terrorist propaganda;Baele S. J.;Studies in Conflict & Terrorism,2019
3. Lethal Images: Analyzing Extremist Visual Propaganda from ISIS and Beyond
4. The Oxford Handbook of Regulation
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献