Recommendations for a step‐wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Recommendations for a step‐wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer

Published:2016-02 Issue:6 Volume:122 Page:826-839
ISSN:0008-543X
Container-title:Cancer
language:en
Short-container-title:Cancer

Author:

Young Graeme P.¹,Senore Carlo²,Mandel Jack S.³,Allison James E.⁴,Atkin Wendy S.⁵,Benamouzig Robert⁶,Bossuyt Patrick M. M.⁷,Silva Mahinda De⁸,Guittet Lydia⁹,Halloran Stephen P.¹⁰,Haug Ulrike¹¹,Hoff Geir¹²,Itzkowitz Steven H.¹³,Leja Marcis¹⁴,Levin Bernard¹⁵,Meijer Gerrit A.¹⁶,O'Morain Colm A.¹⁷,Parry Susan¹⁸,Rabeneck Linda¹⁹,Rozen Paul²⁰,Saito Hiroshi²¹,Schoen Robert E.²²,Seaman Helen E.²³,Steele Robert J. C.²⁴,Sung Joseph J. Y.²⁵,Winawer Sidney J.²⁶

Affiliation:

1. Flinders Center for Innovation in CancerFlinders UniversityAdelaide South Australia Australia

2. Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention, Piedmont Regional Center for Preventive OncologyCity Health and Science University Hospital of TurinTurin Italy

3. Environmental and Occupational MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis Minnesota

4. Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of California, San Francisco and Kaiser Division of ResearchOakland California

5. Gastrointestinal EpidemiologyImperial CollegeLondon United Kingdom

6. Gastroenterology Department, Avicenne HospitalParis 13 UniversityParis France

7. Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdam The Netherlands

8. Department of GastroenterologyRepatriation General HospitalAdelaide South Australia Australia

9. Unit 1086, French National Institute for Health and Medical Research, Cancers and Preventions CenterCaen University HospitalCaen France

10. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of SurreyGuildford United Kingdom

11. Department of Clinical EpidemiologyLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and EpidemiologyBremen Germany

12. Telemark Hospital, Skein Cancer Registry of NorwayUniversity of OsloOslo Norway

13. Gastrointestinal DivisionIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York New York

14. Digestive Diseases Center, GASTRO, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of LatviaRiga Latvia

15. Division of Cancer PreventionThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston Texas

16. Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdam The Netherlands

17. Faculty of Health ScienceTrinity College DublinDublin Ireland

18. Ministry of Health Bowel Cancer ProgramAuckland HospitalAuckland New Zealand

19. Prevention and Cancer ControlCancer Care Ontario, and University of TorontoToronto Ontario Canada

20. Department of GastroenterologySestopali Fund for Gastrointestinal Cancer PreventionTel Aviv Israel

21. Research Center for Cancer Prevention and ScreeningNational Cancer CenterTokyo Japan

22. Department of Medicine and EpidemiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh Pennsylvania

23. National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Program HubRoyal Surrey County HospitalGuildford United Kingdom

24. Department of SurgeryUniversity of DundeeDundee Scotland

25. Office of the Vice ChancellorThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin China

26. Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service, Department of MedicineMemorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer CenterNew York New York

Funder

World Gastroenterology Organization

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cncr.29865

Reference58 articles.

1. When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials?

2. WilsonJMG JungerG World Health Organization (WHO).Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Public Health Papers no. 34. Geneva Switzerland WHO;1968.

3. Phases of Biomarker Development for Early Detection of Cancer

4. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

5. Effect of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy-Based Screening on Incidence and Mortality of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Progress in the field of noninvasive diagnostics for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for detection of advanced pre-cancerous lesions;Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics;2023-12-02

2. An efficient strategy for evaluating new non-invasive screening tests for colorectal cancer: the guiding principles;Gut;2023-07-18

3. Understanding the design of test accuracy studies;Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy;2023-06-16

4. Clinical Performance Study of a Fecal Bacterial Signature Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening;2023-01-19

5. The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design;BMC Cancer;2022-12-12