Angiographic patterns of restenosis after drug‐coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions and 1‐year prognosis after repeat endovascular therapy

Author:

Higashino Naoko1ORCID,Iida Osamu2ORCID,Ishihara Takayuki1ORCID,Hata Yosuke1,Toyoshima Taku2ORCID,Tsukizawa Tomofumi3ORCID,Nishian Kunihiko4,Fujihara Masahiko3ORCID,Kawasaki Daizo4,Mano Toshiaki1

Affiliation:

1. Kansai Rosai Hospital Cardiovascular Center Amagasaki Hyogo Japan

2. Cardiovascular Division Osaka Police Hospital Osaka Japan

3. Department of Cardiology Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital Kishiwada Osaka Japan

4. Department of Cardiology Morinomiya Hospital Morinomiya Osaka Japan

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of the current study sought to investigate the angiographic patterns of restenosis after drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions and which repeat endovascular therapy (EVT) for DCB restenosis would provide more freedom from recurrent restenosis.MethodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 119 limbs (chronic limb‐threatening ischemia [CLTI]: 55%, lesion length: 136.9 ± 89.6 mm, chronic total occlusion: 25%) of 95 patients (diabetes mellitus: 70%, hemodialysis: 56%) who were diagnosed with DCB restenosis between January 2018 and December 2019. The cases were classified into three groups based on angiographic patterns of restenosis: Class I: focal lesions ≤50 mm, Class II: diffuse lesions >50 mm, and Class III: totally occluded lesions. The DCB restenosis patterns and frequency and predictors of recurrent restenosis after repeated EVT (re‐EVT) were investigated.ResultsThe mean follow‐up duration was 29.8 ± 9.5 months. Groups I, II, and III comprised of 30 (25.2%), 55 (46.2%), and 34 (29.0%) cases, respectively. The overall rate of 1‐year freedom from recurrent restenosis was 58.2%. One‐year rate of freedom from recurrent restenosis after repeat DCB was not statistically different from that after scaffolding (71.1% vs. 74.6%, respectively, p = 0.911); however, it was significantly better than that after noncoated balloon angioplasty (repeat DCB vs. noncoated balloon angioplasty: 71.1% vs. 25.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CLTI (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.15, p < 0.001) and re‐EVT with noncoated balloon (HR: 3.16, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with recurrent restenosis; however, Class III pattern of DCB restenosis was not associated with recurrent restenosis (HR: 1.04, p = 0.918).ConclusionsThis study revealed the angiographic patterns of restenosis after DCB therapy for FP lesions and the 1‐year rate of recurrent restenosis after repeat revascularization. Repeat DCB therapy demonstrated acceptable 1‐year recurrent restenosis rates.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3