Data‐driven plant‐model mismatch quantification in closed‐loop system based on output predictions

Author:

Shi Yimiao1ORCID,Xu Xiaodong1ORCID,Dubljevic Stevan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Automation Central South University Changsha China

2. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractThe assessment and diagnosis of controller performance for model‐based closed‐loop control systems has received considerable attention in recent years. A recognized factor dilapidating the controller performance is mismatching the true dynamical model of the plant and the mathematic model employed in the controller. In order to reduce the heavy effort to re‐identify the entire model, a large amount of recent works have been focusing on locating the mismatch. To further improve the mathematic model as well as controller performance, in this article, we provide a novel prediction‐based plant‐model mismatch quantification approach, which belongs to the class of moment match methodology. In particular, two cases of output prediction are considered: one‐step ahead prediction and multistep ahead prediction. Compared with existing efforts along the same line of mismatch quantification, when using the one‐step ahead prediction, our method shows an advantage of light computational complexity. On the other hand, when utilizing multistep predictions, it shows better convergence and robustness than the former, especially in the case of structural mismatches, and the long‐term prediction capability of the model is employed. With both predictions and consideration of the existence of unknown noise models in practice, we show that the plant‐model mismatch and unknown parameters of noise models can be quantified as the solution of a minimization issue that penalizes the discrepancy between the sample of plant outputs and the predictions calculated by considering the plant‐model mismatch and noise model parameters. Several examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, respectively.

Funder

National Key Research and Development Program of China

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3