Denosumab and Mortality in a Real‐World Setting: A Comparative Study

Author:

Alarkawi Dunia1ORCID,Tran Thach1ORCID,Chen Weiwen12ORCID,March Lyn M34,Blyth Fiona M5,Blank Robert D1ORCID,Bliuc Dana16ORCID,Center Jacqueline R12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Skeletal Diseases Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research University of New South Wales Sydney Australia

2. Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital University of New South Wales Sydney Australia

3. Institute of Bone and Joint Research Kolling Institute Sydney Australia

4. Clinical School Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards Australia

5. Clinical School, Concord Repatriation General Hospital Sydney Australia

6. School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health University of New South Wales Sydney Sydney Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACTDenosumab (Dmab) is increasingly prescribed worldwide. Unlike bisphosphonates (BPs), its effect on mortality has yet to be well explored. This study examined the association between Dmab and all‐cause mortality compared with no treatment in subjects with a fracture and BPs in subjects without a fracture. The study population was from the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study (n = 267,357), a prospective population‐based cohort with questionnaire data linked to hospital admissions (Admitted Patients Data Collection [APDC] data were linked by the Centre for Health Record Linkage), medication records (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme [PBS] provided by Services Australia), and stored securely (secure data access was provided through the Sax Institute's Secure Unified Research Environment [SURE]). The new‐user cohort design with propensity‐score (PS) matching was implemented. In the fracture cohort, Dmab and oral BP users were matched 1:2 to no treatment (Dmab: 617 women, 154 men; oral BPs: 615 women, 266 men). In the no‐fracture cohort, Dmab users were matched 1:1 with oral BPs and zoledronic acid (Zol) users (Dmab:oral BPs: 479 men, 1534 women; Dmab:Zol: 280 men, 625 women). Mortality risk was measured using sex‐specific pairwise multivariable Cox models. In the fracture cohort, compared with no treatment, Dmab was associated with 48% lower mortality in women (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36–0.72) but not in men. Oral BPs were associated with 44% lower mortality in both sexes (women HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.42–0.77; men HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.40–0.78). In the no‐fracture cohort, compared with BPs, Dmab was associated with 1.5‐ to 2.5‐fold higher mortality than oral BPs (women HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.13–1.98; men HR = 2.74; 95% CI 1.82–4.11) but similar mortality to Zol. Dmab in women and oral BPs were associated with lower post‐fracture mortality than no treatment. However, Dmab users had generally higher mortality than oral BP users in those without fractures. © 2023 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3