New proposal to address mediation analysis interrogations by using genetic variants as instrumental variables

Author:

Coscia Claudia123,Molina‐Montes Esther1245,Benítez Raquel12,López de Maturana Evangelina12,Muriel Alfonso67,Malats Núria12,Pérez Teresa38ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) Madrid Spain

2. CIBERONC Madrid Spain

3. Department of Statistics and Data Science Universidad Complutense de Madrid Madrid Spain

4. Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Facultad de Farmacia Universidad de Granada Granada Spain

5. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA Granada Spain

6. Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERESP Madrid Spain

7. Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy Universidad de Alcalá de Henares Madrid Spain

8. Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Blizard Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK

Abstract

AbstractThe application of causal mediation analysis (CMA) considering the mediation effect of a third variable is increasing in epidemiological studies; however, this requires fitting strong assumptions on confounding bias. To address this limitation, we propose an extension of CMA combining it with Mendelian randomization (MRinCMA). We applied the new approach to analyse the causal effect of obesity and diabetes on pancreatic cancer, considering each factor as potential mediator. To check the performance of MRinCMA under several conditions/scenarios, we used it in different simulated data sets and compared it with structural equation models. For continuous variables, MRinCMA and structural equation models performed similarly, suggesting that both approaches are valid to obtain unbiased estimates. When noncontinuous variables were considered, MRinCMA presented, overall, lower bias than structural equation models. By applying MRinCMA, we did not find any evidence of causality of obesity or diabetes on pancreatic cancer. With this new methodology, researchers would be able to address CMA hypotheses by appropriately accounting for the confounding bias assumption regardless of the conditions used in their studies in different settings.

Funder

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3