Comparative accuracy and resolution assessment of two prototype proton computed tomography scanners

Author:

Dedes George1,Drosten Hubertus1,Götz Stefanie1,Dickmann Jannis1,Sarosiek Christina2,Pankuch Mark3,Krah Nils4,Rit Simon4,Bashkirov Vladimir5,Schulte Reinhard W.5,Johnson Robert P.6,Parodi Katia1,DeJongh Ethan7,Landry Guillaume189

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Physics Faculty of Physics Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München München Germany

2. Department of Physics Northern Illinois University DeKalb Illinois USA

3. Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center Warrenville Illinois USA

4. University of Lyon INSA‐Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Lyon France

5. Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences Loma Linda University Loma Linda California USA

6. Department of Physics U.C. Santa Cruz Santa Cruz California USA

7. ProtonVDA LLC Naperville Illinois USA

8. Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital LMU Munich Munich Germany

9. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Munich Germany

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundImproving the accuracy of relative stopping power (RSP) in proton therapy may allow reducing range margins. Proton computed tomography (pCT) has been shown to provide state‐of‐the‐art RSP accuracy estimation, and various scanner prototypes have recently been built. The different approaches used in scanner design are expected to impact spatial resolution and RSP accuracy.PurposeThe goal of this study was to perform the first direct comparison, in terms of spatial resolution and RSP accuracy, of two pCT prototype scanners installed at the same facility and by using the same image reconstruction algorithm.MethodsA phantom containing cylindrical inserts of known RSP was scanned at the phase‐II pCT prototype of the U.S. pCT collaboration and at the commercially oriented ProtonVDA scanner. Following distance‐driven binning filtered backprojection reconstruction, the radial edge spread function of high‐density inserts was used to estimate the spatial resolution. RSP accuracy was evaluated by the mean absolute percent error (MAPE) over the inserts. No direct imaging dose estimation was possible, which prevented a comparison of the two scanners in terms of RSP noise.ResultsIn terms of RSP accuracy, both scanners achieved the same MAPE of 0.72% when excluding the porous sinus insert from the evaluation. The ProtonVDA scanner reached a better overall MAPE when all inserts and the body of the phantom were accounted for (0.81%), compared to the phase‐II scanner (1.14%). The spatial resolution with the phase‐II scanner was found to be 0.61 lp/mm, while for the ProtonVDA scanner somewhat lower at 0.46 lp/mm.ConclusionsThe comparison between two prototype pCT scanners operated in the same clinical facility showed that they both fulfill the requirement of an RSP accuracy of about 1%. Their spatial resolution performance reflects the different design choices of either a scanner with full tracking capabilities (phase‐II) or of a more compact tracker system, which only provides the positions of protons but not their directions (ProtonVDA).

Funder

Bayerisch-Kalifornischen Hochschulzentrum

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3