Impact of publisher's commercial or non‐profit orientation on editorial practices: Moving towards a more strategic approach to supporting editorial staff

Author:

Krapež Katarina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department for Data Sciences, Division for Legal Studies Faculty of Information Studies Novo mesto Slovenia

Abstract

AbstractThis study was guided by previous research highlighting the significance of journal publishers' commercial or non‐profit orientations in shaping academic editors' perspectives regarding the necessity of enhancing editorial and business practices. There is limited understanding of how the editor–publisher relationship varies based on publishers' commercial orientation. This study revealed five key factors influencing editors' attitudes towards how publishers strive to provide high‐quality publications: (i) availability of high‐quality publication services; (ii) sufficient technological support and access to visibility‐related data; (iii) accessible marketing and indexing services; (iv) access to continuous education for the editorial team; and (v) a balance between editorial autonomy and publisher support in managing the journal. The study indicated that editors partnering with commercial publishers tended to receive more extensive and advanced services, better technological support, and more training opportunities, contributing to the production of superior end products. However, working with commercial publishers resulted in the trade‐off of less editorial independence, which sometimes compromised editors' decision‐making ability and made them feel uncertain about their further involvement. The study's findings highlighted the importance of publishers adopting a more strategic approach to support their editorial staff, while considering the unique needs of each journal.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Communication,Library and Information Sciences

Reference45 articles.

1. Editing a higher education journal: Gatekeeping or development?

2. Anderson K.(2018).Focusing on Value—102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update). The Scholarly Kitchen: a moderated and independent blog established by The Society for Scholarly Publishing.https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/02/06/focusing-value-102-things-journal-publishers-2018-update/

3. The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals

4. Copyright and Mass Digitization

5. Council of Science Editors. (2020).White paper on publication ethics: CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications.www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/editorial-policies/white-paper-on-publication-ethics/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3