Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia for open radical cystectomy: A controlled study

Author:

Galletta Maria1,De Pasquale Maria1,Buttitta Alessandro2,Viganò Silvia2,Mucciardi Giuseppe2,Giannarini Gianluca3ORCID,Ficarra Vincenzo2

Affiliation:

1. Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Anaesthesiology Section University of Messina Messina Italy

2. Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Urology Section University of Messina Messina Italy

3. Urology Unit Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital Udine Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of loco‐regional anaesthesia and to compare perioperative outcomes between loco‐regional and standard general anaesthesia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC).Patients and MethodsA single‐surgeon cohort of 60 consecutive patients with bladder cancer undergoing ORC with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol between May 2020 and December 2021 was analysed. A study group of 15 patients operated on under combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia was compared with a control group of 45 patients receiving standard general anaesthesia. Intraoperative outcomes were haemodynamic stability, estimated blood loss, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion rate, and anaesthesia time. Postoperative outcomes were pain assessment 24 h after surgery, time to mobilisation, return to oral diet, time to bowel function recovery, length of stay and rate of 90‐day complications.ResultsNo patients required conversion from loco‐regional to general anaesthesia. All patients in both groups were haemodynamically stable. No significant differences between groups were observed for all other intraoperative outcomes, except for a shorter anaesthesia time in the study versus control group (250 vs. 290 min, p = 0.01). Pain visual score 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the study versus control group (0 vs. 2, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for all other postoperative outcomes, with a comparable time to bowel function recovery (5 days in each group for stool passage), and 90‐day complication rate (46.6% vs. 42.2% for the study vs. control group, p = 0.76).ConclusionOur exploratory, controlled study confirmed the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a pure loco‐regional anaesthesia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing ORC. No significant differences were observed in intra‐ and postoperative outcomes between loco‐regional and general anaesthesia, except for a significantly shorter anaesthesia time and greater pain reduction in the early postoperative period for the former.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3