Scientific Advisory Committees at the World Health Organization: A Qualitative Study of How Their Design Affects Quality, Relevance, and Legitimacy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Scientific Advisory Committees at the World Health Organization: A Qualitative Study of How Their Design Affects Quality, Relevance, and Legitimacy

Published:2018-08-12 Issue:9 Volume:2 Page:1700074
ISSN:2056-6646
Container-title:Global Challenges
language:en
Short-container-title:Global Challenges

Author:

Gopinathan Unni¹²³^ORCID,Hoffman Steven J.³⁴⁵,Ottersen Trygve¹²³

Affiliation:

1. Division for Health Services; Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 0473 Oslo Norway

2. Oslo Group on Global Health Policy; Department of Community Medicine and Global Health and Centre for Global Health; Institute of Health and Society; Faculty of Medicine; University of Oslo; 0450 Oslo Norway

3. Global Strategy Lab; Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research; Faculty of Health and Osgoode Hall Law School; York University; Toronto Ontario M3J 1P3 Canada

4. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact and McMaster Health Forum; McMaster University; Hamilton Ontario L8S 4L8 Canada

5. Department of Global Health and Population; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard University; Boston MA 02115 USA

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science

Publisher

Wiley

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/gch2.201700074/fullpdf

Reference96 articles.

1. Science advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC