Advantages and limitations of different methods to determine the optimum formulation in surfactant–oil–water systems: A review

Author:

Marquez Ronald12ORCID,Ontiveros Jesús F.3ORCID,Barrios Nelson24ORCID,Tolosa Laura5ORCID,Palazzo Gerardo6ORCID,Nardello‐Rataj Véronique3ORCID,Salager Jean Louis7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ESPCI Paris PSL University Paris France

2. Department of Forest Biomaterials North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

3. Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Univ. Artois UMR 8181, UCCS, Unité de Catalyse et Chimie du Solide Lille France

4. Laboratory of Petroleum, Hydrocarbons and Derivatives University of Carabobo Valencia Venezuela

5. Polymers and Colloids Laboratory School of Chemical Engineering, University of the Andes Mérida Venezuela

6. Department of Chemistry University of Bari, and CSGI (Center for Colloid and Surface Science) Bari Italy

7. FIRP Laboratory School of Chemical Engineering, University of the Andes Mérida Venezuela

Abstract

AbstractThe optimum formulation in a surfactant–oil–water (SOW) system is defined as the physicochemical situation at which the surfactant adsorbed at the interface exhibits exactly equal interactions for both oil and water. Identifying the optimum formulation of SOW systems is crucial in various industrial applications, ranging from pharmaceuticals to cosmetics and to petroleum issues like dehydration and enhanced oil recovery. Multiple techniques are available to identify the optimum formulation, often with its own advantages and limitations. In this comprehensive review, we provide an in‐depth analysis of the systematic use of formulation scans to identify the optimum formulation in SOW systems. We critically assess different methods, including conventional ones, such as phase behavior observation, determination of the minimum interfacial tension from equilibrated systems, and the localization of the minimum emulsion stability using formulation scans. We also mention a new promising technique that can be applied in practice, such as oscillating spinning drop interfacial rheology (OSDIR) as well as others that allow an understanding of some structural features of the domains present in the surfactant‐rich phase in SOW systems. Among these methods, dynamic light scattering (DLS), small angle scattering (SAXS and SANS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), X‐ray microcomputed tomography (Micro‐CT), and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), can be found in the literature. Finally, we discuss potentially unusual behaviors that can appear in complex systems, thus providing guidance on the selection of the most suitable method tailored to the specific application.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surfaces, Coatings and Films,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,General Chemical Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3