The role of relative advantage for development of sequencing‐based diagnostics for pediatric cancer in low‐ and middle‐income countries

Abstract

Efforts to address limitations in cancer diagnostics in low‐ and middle‐income countries should follow an approach that avoids two extremes: unproductive attempts to require implementation of high‐income country gold standards or acquiescence to the diagnostic status quo. The relative advantage of implementing new diagnostic tests (including sequencing‐based approaches) should be determined through comparison to local standards of care, with context‐specific clinical utility determined using locally available therapeutic options.