Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival

Author:

McArdle C S1,Hole D J2

Affiliation:

1. University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

2. Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Previous studies have reported that emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor outcome. Many of these studies were small and most were not adjusted for case mix. The aim of this study was to establish, after adjusting for case mix, the magnitude of the differences in postoperative mortality and survival between patients undergoing elective surgery and those presenting as an emergency. Methods Three thousand two hundred patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 in Scotland were studied. Five-year survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios were calculated. Results Some 1603 (72·4 per cent) of 2214 elective patients had a potentially curative resection compared with 632 (64·1 per cent) of 986 patients who presented as an emergency (P < 0·001). Following curative resection, the postoperative mortality rate was 2·8 per cent after elective and 8·2 per cent after emergency operation (P < 0·001). Overall survival at 5 years was 57·5 per cent after elective and 39·1 per cent after emergency curative surgery (P < 0·001); cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 70·9 and 52·9 per cent respectively (P < 0·001). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival after emergency relative to elective surgery was 1·68 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·49 to 1·90; P < 0·001) and that for cancer-specific survival was 1·90 (95 per cent c.i. 1·62 to 2·22; P < 0·001). Conclusion Following apparently curative resection for colorectal cancer, there was an excess of both cancer-related and intercurrent deaths in patients who presented as an emergency.

Funder

Clinical Resource and Audit Group, Chief Scientist Office, Scotland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 265 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3