Serological screening for cytomegalovirus during pregnancy: A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements

Author:

Xie Maria1ORCID,Tripathi Tanya12,Holmes Natasha E.23,Hui Lisa1245ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Mercy Perinatal Mercy Hospital for Women Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Department of Infectious Diseases Austin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Northern Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

5. Reproductive Epidemiology Group Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCongenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common congenital infection worldwide. cCMV can lead to severe long‐term sequelae, including neurological impairment and developmental delay. We performed a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines containing recommendations concerning serological screening for CMV during pregnancy.MethodWe performed a search of MEDLINE, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP) database and the grey literature for clinical practice guidelines or consensus statements published in the English language from Jan 2010 to June 2022. The quality of the included guidelines was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Textual synthesis was used to summarise and compare the recommendations on CMV serological screening in pregnancy.ResultsEleven guidelines and two consensus statements were included. None recommended universal serological screening for CMV in pregnant women; five recommended screening for high‐risk women (those with frequent contact with young children). The overall quality of the guidelines varied; most were medium or low.ConclusionsAlthough clinical practice guidelines do not actively recommend routine serological screening in pregnancy, most did not meet standard processes for development and predated the emerging data on valaciclovir as a potential intervention. Existing recommendations are underpinned by limited, low‐level evidence, exposing the lack of robust data in this area of practice. Further high‐level evidence and methodologically robust guidelines are needed to guide clinical practice in this rapidly changing field.

Funder

Norman Beischer Medical Research Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3