Multidisciplinary management of persistent pain in primary care—A systematic review

Author:

Huttunen Merja H.12ORCID,Paananen Markus2345,Miettunen Jouko34,Kalso Eija1,Marttinen Maiju K.267

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland

2. Kerava Health Center Kerava Finland

3. Research Unit of Population Health University of Oulu Oulu Finland

4. Medical Research Center Oulu Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu Oulu Finland

5. Primary Health Care Services, City of Espoo Espoo Finland

6. The Rehabilitation Center of Central Uusimaa The Wellbeing Services County of Central Uusimaa Finland

7. Department of Public Health University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectiveA multidisciplinary approach is the gold standard in the management of persistent pain and is current practice in tertiary pain clinics. However, such approaches seem to be a rarity in primary care, although pain is the most common reason for visiting a primary care physician. A comprehensive systematic review was conducted to explore whether studies on multidisciplinary management programs for persistent pain exist in primary care.Databases and Data TreatmentPubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to October 2022, and supplementary research was conducted in June 2023. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently carried out by two researchers. The inclusion criteria were (1) adult patients (age >18 years); (2) non‐cancer pain, persisting over 3 months; (3) multidisciplinary intervention (treatment included ≥3 heathcare professionals); (4) intervention conducted in a primary care setting; and (5) reports published in English.ResultsOf the 1250 initially identified studies, 17 were selected for final analysis. Only studies reporting empirical data were included (cohort, case–control, randomized controlled trial, and observational). The study settings and intervention characteristics showed great heterogeneity. The primary care practices also varied across different countries and cultures. Overall, the quality of the studies was rather low and sample sizes were relatively small.ConclusionsThe review revealed that studies about such treatment interventions for persistent pain patients are scarce. The existing studies were heterogeneous in terms of intervention characteristics, population, outcome variables, and study methodology. Future studies are urgently needed.SignificancePersistent pain is a growing challenge to the health care system, and most patients are treated in primary care. The biopsychosocial concept is the basis for the multidisciplinary management of pain. The review revealed that studies about treatment interventions for persistent pain patients are scarce. Existing studies were heterogeneous in terms of intervention characteristics, population, outcome variables, and study methodology. There is an urgent need for further studies on systematic multidisciplinary treatment protocols for managing persistent pain in primary care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3