Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects

Author:

Sunnergren Ola12ORCID,Ahonen Hanna2,Holmström Mats3,Broström Anders456

Affiliation:

1. Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic Region Jönköping County Jönköping Sweden

2. Centre for Oral Health, Department of Odontology and Oral Health, School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden

3. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Ear Nose and Throat Diseases, Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden

4. Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden

5. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology University Hospital Linköping Linköping Sweden

6. Department of Health and Caring Sciences Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Vestlandet Norway

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAnterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) is widely used in Swedish routine clinical practice to decide if septoplasty is necessary. The scientific basis for the method needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the aims were to evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR), paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion, and test–retest characteristics of the Rhino‐Comp® AAR in healthy subjects.MethodsA prospective longitudinal design was used. AAR was performed before and after decongestion at baseline and after ≥6 months on 60 healthy volunteers. The relationships between NAR, height, weight, BMI, sex, and allergic rhinitis were evaluated by regression analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate paradoxical reactions. Test–retest and repeatability characteristics were evaluated with intra‐class coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's α, and standard error of measurementResultsNo statistically significant differences were found between genders or nasal cavity sides. NAR was statistically significantly related to height. Short‐ and long‐term test–retest characteristics were good with ICC and Cronbach's α > .75. The minimal significant difference in NAR Log10V2 values between the two measurements was 0.11 and 0.09 (long‐ and short‐term). Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion were rare, mostly weak, and not evidently reproducible.ConclusionIn this study, we report reference data for healthy subjects, test–retest capabilities, and the minimal relevant difference between two measurements for the Rhino‐Comp® AAR, information that is vital and necessary for the appropriate use of AAR in clinical practice. An effective method for pharmacological decongestion is described and recommended for future studies and clinical practice. Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestants exist but maybe without clinical significance.Level of EvidenceNA.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. European position paper on diagnostic tools in rhinology;Rimmer J;Rhinology,2019

2. The Swedish Septoplasty Register.Public statistics page.https://sep.registercentrum.seIn Swedish. Accessed May 19 2023

3. Rinomanometri—Hur gör vi runt om i landet? Hur kan vi bli bättre?;Sunnergren O;Svensk ÖNH‐Tidskrift,2022

4. Rhinomanometry

5. Standardisation committee on objective assessment of the nasal airway, IRS, and ERS. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry;Clement PA;Rhinology,2005

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3