Adhesion barriers in gynecologic surgeries and cesarean section: An Asia‐Pacific expert panel consensus recommendation

Author:

Tanigaki Shinji1,Batra Achla2,Chan Te‐Fu3,Kang Julian Hean‐Leng4,Lam Siu‐Keung5,Lim Timothy Yong‐Kuei6,Mayya Raghavendra7,Nur Azurah Abdul Ghani8,Walker Graeme9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kyorin University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Safdarjung Hospital New Delhi India

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kaohsiung Medical University Chung‐Ho Memorial Hospital Kaohsiung Taiwan

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore Singapore

5. Prestige Medical Center Hong Kong China

6. Timothy Lim Clinic for Women & Cancer Surgery Mount Alvernia Hospital Singapore Singapore

7. Advanced Surgery Division Baxter Worldwide Medical Affairs Singapore Singapore

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Gold Coast Private Hospital Gold Coast Australia

Abstract

AbstractAdhesions arising from gynecologic surgeries and cesarean sections pose substantial clinical, social, and economic challenges, leading to issues like pelvic pain, infertility, bowel obstruction, and recurring surgeries. Preventing adhesions is a pressing unmet need, hindered by difficulties in assessing postoperative adhesions and understanding barriers. To bridge adhesion prevention gaps, statements on clinical practices were synthesized to present Asia‐Pacific expert perspectives on gynecologic surgery and cesarean section adhesion prevention. An expert panel of eight physicians from various healthcare settings in the Asia‐Pacific region was convened and a comprehensive literature search on topics related to adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgeries and cesarean sections was performed. Information from full‐text publications was used to develop draft consensus statements, with each statement assigned the highest available evidence level based on a systematic literature review and graded using the Oxford Center for Evidence‐based Medicine criteria. A modified Delphi process, involving two rounds of online voting and discussions with an extended group of 109 experts, was employed to reach a consensus on six topics related to adhesion barriers. A set of 15 consensus statements were synthesized. Key topics include adhesion incidence in Asia, cesarean section complications, barrier application status, adhesion formation and prevention, absorbable barriers' effectiveness, recommendations, and future considerations. The statements provide guidance for healthcare professionals, especially in the Asia‐Pacific region, to tackle the challenges posed by postoperative adhesions and improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to enhance understanding and prevention of adhesions in this region.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3