A Score to Predict the Clinical Usefulness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Application to Oral Molecular Targeted Therapies in Cancer

Author:

Géraud Arthur123ORCID,Combarel David45ORCID,Funck‐Brentano Christian6ORCID,Beaulieu Quentin6ORCID,Zahr Noël6,Broutin Sophie4ORCID,Spano Jean‐Philippe78ORCID,Massard Christophe29ORCID,Besse Benjamin13ORCID,Gougis Paul6710ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cancer Medicine Gustave Roussy Villejuif France

2. Early Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy Villejuif France

3. Paris‐Saclay University Orsay France

4. Pharmacology Department Gustave Roussy Villejuif France

5. Faculty of Pharmacy Paris‐Saclay University Chatenay‐Malabry France

6. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Investigation Center (CIC‐1901), AP‐HP.Sorbonne Université, Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hospital, INSERM, CIC‐1901 and UMR‐S 1166 Sorbonne Université Médecine Paris France

7. Oncology Department APHP‐Sorbonne Université, Cancer Institute (IUC) Paris France

8. INSERM, UMRS 1136 Paris France

9. Centre Eugène Marquis Rennes France

10. Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer Curie Institute, Université Paris Paris France

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) involves measuring and interpreting drug concentrations in biological fluids to adjust drug dosages. In onco‐hematology, TDM guidelines for oral molecular targeted therapies (oMTTs) are varied. This study evaluates a quantitative approach with a score to predict the clinical usefulness of TDM for oMTTs. We identified key parameters for an oMTT's suitability for TDM from standard TDM recommendations. We gathered oMTT pharmacological data, which covered exposure variability (considering pharmacokinetic (PK) impact of food and proton pump inhibitors), technical intricacy (PK linearity and active metabolites), efficacy (exposure‐response relationship), and safety (maximum tolerated dose, and exposure‐safety relationship). To assess the validity and the relevance of the score and define relevant thresholds, we evaluated molecules with prospective validation or strong recommendations for TDM, both in oncology and in other fields. By September 1, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 67 oMTTs for onco‐hematological indications. Scores ranged from 15 (acalabrutinib) to 80 (sunitinib) with an average of 48.3 and a standard deviation of 15.6. Top scorers included sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, nilotinib, and abemaciclib. Based on scores, drugs were categorized into low (< 40), intermediate (≥ 40 and < 60), and high (≥ 60) relevance for TDM. Notably, negative controls generally scored around or under 40, whereas positive controls had a high score across different indications. In this work, we propose a quantitative and reproducible score to compare the potential usefulness of TDM for oMTTs. Future guidelines should prioritize the TDM for molecules with the highest score.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3