Evaluation of the effects of multiple capture methods and immobilization drugs on mountain lion welfare

Author:

Dellinger Justin A.1ORCID,Basto Ana F.2,Vickers T. Winston3,Wilmers Christopher C.4,Sikich Jeffrey A.5,Riley Seth P. D.5,Gammons Daniel6,Martins Quinton E.7,Wittmer Heiko U.8,Garcelon David K.9,Allen Maximilian L.10,Cristescu Bogdan4,Clifford Deana L.11

Affiliation:

1. Large Carnivore Section, Wyoming Game and Fish Department Lander WY 82520 USA

2. Cheetah Conservation Fund Otjiwarongo Namibia

3. Wildlife Health Center University of California Davis CA 95616 USA

4. Environmental Studies Department University of California Santa Cruz CA 95060 USA

5. National Park Service Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Thousand Oaks CA 91360 USA

6. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Desert Region Bishop CA 93514 USA

7. Audubon Canyon Ranch Stinson Beach CA 94970 USA

8. School of Biological Sciences Victoria University of Wellington Wellington NZ 6140 New Zealand

9. Institute for Wildlife Studies Arcata CA 95518 USA

10. Illinois Natural History Survey University of Illinois Champaign IL 61820 USA

11. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Health Lab Rancho Cordova CA 95670 USA

Abstract

AbstractUsing a dataset of 591 capture events between 2001–2019 in California, USA, we examined the impact of capture methods and immobilization drugs on mountain lion (Puma concolor) welfare. The 3 methods used to capture mountain lions were cage traps, trained hounds, and cable restraints. The drugs used to immobilize mountain lions were either tiletamine/zolazepam (Telazol®), ketamine/medetomidine, or ketamine/xylazine. Mortality occurred in 1.4% of captures, with only one mortality out of 310 captures occurring since 2012. We used a logistic regression framework to compare morbidity and vital parameters of mountain lions among the different capture methods and immobilization drugs used. Vomiting (a risk factor for developing aspiration pneumonia) was the most common severe risk factor associated with cage trapping and was only seen with the use of ketamine/medetomidine or ketamine/xylazine. Morbidity scores were not well predicted by any of the variables we accounted for. Animals immobilized with Telazol® were more likely to experience abnormal heart and respiratory rates, as well as high body temperatures, than those immobilized with the other two combinations. Although there are risks associated with each of the capture methods and drug combinations commonly used in mountain lion captures in California, our analyses demonstrated they are all relatively safe when following appropriate animal welfare practices. Our analyses suggested that unaccounted for factors are equally or more important in explaining injury and physiological abnormality rates, and we urge that agencies train personnel in best practices and conservative decision‐making in order to assure that the welfare of the animal takes precedence over collaring. We suggest training on how to choose between several capture techniques, immobilization drugs and monitoring methods and how to reduce both detrimental effects to mountain lions and danger to humans.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3