External validation of a novel electronic risk score for cancer‐associated thrombosis in a comprehensive cancer center

Author:

Li Ang1ORCID,De Las Pozas Giordana2,Andersen Clark R.3,Nze Chijioke C.4,Toale Katy M.5,Milner Emily M.6,Fillmore Nathanael R.78910,Chiao Elizabeth Yu11ORCID,Rojas Hernandez Cristhiam12,Kroll Michael H.12,Merriman Kelly W.2,Flowers Christopher R.13

Affiliation:

1. Section of Hematology‐Oncology Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

2. Department of Tumor Registry The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

3. Department of Biostatistics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

4. Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

5. Division of Pharmacy The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

6. School of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA

7. Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Section of Hematology & Medical Oncology Boston University School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

10. Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

11. Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

12. Section of Benign Hematology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

13. Department of Lymphoma‐Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant complication for cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy. We performed an independent external validation for a recently derived and validated a novel electronic health record (EHR) VTE risk score in a comprehensive cancer center. Adult patients with incident cancer diagnoses were identified from MD Anderson Cancer Center Tumor Registry 1/2017–1/2021. Baseline covariates extracted at the time of first‐line systemic therapy included demographics, cancer site/histology, stage, treatment, complete blood count, body mass index, recent prolonged hospitalization, and history of VTE or paralysis. VTE was ascertained using an institution‐specific natural language processing radiology algorithm (positive predictive value of 94.8%). The median follow‐up for 21 142 cancer patients was 8.1 months. There were 1067 (5.7%) VTE within 6 months after systemic therapy. The distribution of the novel score for 0‐, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5+ was 5661, 3558, 3462, 3489, 2918, and 2054; while the corresponding 6‐month VTE incidence was 1.3%, 3.1%, 5.4%, 7.3%, 9.3%, and 13.8%, respectively (c statistic 0.71 [95% CI 0.69–0.72] with excellent calibration). In comparison, the Khorana score had a c statistic of 0.64 [95% CI 0.62–0.65]. The two risk scores had 80% concordance; the novel score reclassified 20% of Khorana score (3530 low‐to‐high with 9.0% VTE; 734 high‐to‐low with 3.4% VTE) and led to a 25% increment in VTEs captured in the high‐risk group. In conclusion, the novel score demonstrated consistent discrimination and calibration across cohorts with heterogenous demographics. It could become a new standard to select high‐risk populations for clinical trials and VTE monitoring.

Funder

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3