Propensity score matching and persistence correction to reduce bias in comparative effectiveness: the effect of cinacalcet use on all‐cause mortality

Author:

Gillespie Iain A.1ORCID,Floege Jürgen2,Gioni Ioanna3,Drüeke Tilman B.4,de Francisco Angel L.5,Anker Stefan D.6,Kubo Yumi7,Wheeler David C.8,Froissart Marc9,

Affiliation:

1. Amgen Ltd Uxbridge UK

2. Division of Nephrology, Medizinische Klinik II RWTH University Hospital Aachen Aachen Germany

3. on behalf of Amgen Ltd UK

4. Inserm Unit 1088, UFR de Médecine et de Pharmacie Université de Picardie Amiens France

5. Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Universitario Valdecilla Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain

6. Department of Innovative Clinical Trials University Medical Centre Göttingen Göttingen Germany

7. Amgen Inc Thousand Oaks CA USA

8. Center for Nephrology University College London UK

9. Amgen Europe GmbH Zug Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe generalisability of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) may be limited by restrictive entry criteria or by their experimental nature. Observational research can provide complementary findings but is prone to bias. Employing propensity score matching, to reduce such bias, we compared the real‐life effect of cinacalcet use on all‐cause mortality (ACM) with findings from the Evaluation of Cinacalcet Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) RCT in chronic haemodialysis patients.MethodsIncident adult haemodialysis patients receiving cinacalcet, recruited in a prospective observational cohort from 2007–2009 (AROii; n = 10,488), were matched to non‐exposed patients regardless of future exposure status. The effect of treatment crossover was investigated with inverse probability of censoring weighted and lag‐censored analyses. EVOLVE ACM data were analysed largely as described for the primary composite endpoint.ResultsAROii patients receiving cinacalcet (n = 532) were matched to 1790 non‐exposed patients. The treatment effect of cinacalcet on ACM in the main AROii analysis (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78–1.35]) was closer to the null than for the Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis of EVOLVE (0.94 [95%CI 0.85–1.04]). Adjusting for non‐persistence by 0‐ and 6‐month lag‐censoring and by inverse probability of censoring weight, the hazard ratios in AROii (0.76 [95%CI 0.51–1.15], 0.84 [95%CI 0.60–1.18] and 0.79 [95%CI 0.56–1.11], respectively) were comparable with those of EVOLVE (0.82 [95%CI 0.67–1.01], 0.83 [95%CI 0.73–0.96] and 0.87 [95%CI 0.71–1.06], respectively).ConclusionsCorrecting for treatment crossover, we observed results in the ‘real‐life’ setting of the AROii observational cohort that closely mirrored the results of the EVOLVE RCT. Persistence‐corrected analyses revealed a trend towards reduced ACM in haemodialysis patients receiving cinacalcet therapy. © 2015 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3