Affiliation:
1. Department of Agricultural Biotechnology Seoul National University Gwanak‐gu Republic of Korea
2. Department of Food and Nutrition Duksung Women's University Dobong‐gu Republic of Korea
3. Center for Food and Bioconvergence Seoul National University Gwanak‐gu Republic of Korea
4. Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences Seoul National University Gwanak‐gu Republic of Korea
Abstract
AbstractBACKGROUNDUnderstanding the relationship between perceived sensory attributes and measurable instrumental properties is crucial for replicating the distinct textures of meat in plant‐based meat analogs. In this study, plant‐based patties composed of textured vegetable protein (TVP) and 10%, 20% and 30% TVPs were substituted with fibers from sweet potato stem (SPS), and their instrumental texture and sensory properties were evaluated.RESULTSSamples with 20% SPS showed hardness, cohesiveness and chewiness, which are the mechanical indicators most similar to those of meat. A descriptive sensory analysis by ten trained participants indicated that the SPS‐supplemented meat analog patties exhibited characteristics similar to pork patties in terms of firmness, toughness, cohesiveness and smoothness compared to the TVP‐only sample. A strong positive correlation between instrumental hardness and sensory firmness was observed (P < 0.01); however, cohesiveness, springiness and chewiness did not show any correlation between instrumental and sensory analyses. Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) values showed positive correlations with sensory cohesiveness, chewiness, toughness, fibrousness, moistness, firmness and springiness (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONThe results demonstrated the feasibility of physically treated fibers from SPS as a partial substitute for TVP in developing meat analogs. Additionally, this study suggested that instrumental hardness and WBSF measurements can be sound parameters for representing sensory texture characteristics while further developing plant‐based meat analogs. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.
Funder
National Research Foundation of Korea
Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries