Review of Studies Evaluating Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures Assessed by the European Medicines Agency Between 2016 and 2021

Author:

Grupstra Renske J.1,Goedecke Thomas2ORCID,Scheffers Jet1,Strassmann Valerie2,Gardarsdottir Helga134ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

2. European Medicines Agency Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

4. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland

Abstract

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) supervises medicines' safe and effective use throughout the product's life cycle by, for example, monitoring the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMMs). Limited information is available on factors associated with effectiveness of RMMs. This study reviews post‐authorization safety studies (PASS) evaluating the effectiveness of RMMs assessed by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) between 2016 and 2021. PASS assessment reports finalized by PRAC between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, were compiled from non‐public EMA databases and PASS characteristics were extracted. Of the 93 PASS included, 62.4% aimed to measure healthcare professionals' awareness, knowledge, and behavior regarding RMMs. There were 67.7% of the 93 PASS that used primary data, 24.7% used secondary data sources, and 7.5% used both. A cross‐sectional study design was most frequently applied (77.4%), followed by a cohort study design (29.0%). Nearly 40% of the included PASS did not render a conclusion on RMM effectiveness. Of the 60% that did render a conclusion, 82.1% were deemed effective. Only minor differences in characteristics were found when stratified by outcome (i.e., effective RMM, ineffective RMM, and no conclusion on RMM effectiveness). To conclude, 4 out of 10 PASS assessing impact of RMMs did not render a conclusion on RMM effectiveness. No clear differences in PASS characteristics were found in relation to their outcomes, indicating that additional research is needed to understand better the underlying reasons for PASS being inconclusive.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference14 articles.

1. European Medicines Agency and Heads of Medicines Agencies.Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module XVI—Risk minimisation measures: selection of tools and effectiveness indicators (Rev1(2014) [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: .

2. Additional risk minimisation measures in the EU- are they eligible for assessment?

3. European Medicines Agency and Heads of Medicines Agencies.Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module V—Risk management systems (Rev2)(2017) [cited 2023 Jun 6]. Available from: .

4. A descriptive review of additional risk minimisation measures applied to EU centrally authorised medicines 2006-2015

5. Risk Minimisation Evaluation with Process Indicators and Behavioural or Health Outcomes in Europe: Systematic Review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3