Affiliation:
1. Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
2. Department of Radiological Sciences University of California Irvine California USA
3. Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital University of Ulsan College of Medicine Gangwon‐do Korea
4. Guangxi Normal University Guilin China
5. The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
6. Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung Taiwan
7. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Imaging of Wenzhou The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou China
Abstract
BackgroundAccurate determination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important for choosing optimal HER2 targeting treatment strategies. HER2‐low is currently considered HER2‐negative, but patients may be eligible to receive new anti‐HER2 drug conjugates.PurposeTo use breast MRI BI‐RADS features for classifying three HER2 levels, first to distinguish HER2‐zero from HER2‐low/positive (Task‐1), and then to distinguish HER2‐low from HER2‐positive (Task‐2).Study TypeRetrospective.Population621 invasive ductal cancer, 245 HER2‐zero, 191 HER2‐low, and 185 HER2‐positive. For Task‐1, 488 cases for training and 133 for testing. For Task‐2, 294 cases for training and 82 for testing.Field Strength/Sequence3.0 T; 3D T1‐weighted DCE, short time inversion recovery T2, and single‐shot EPI DWI.AssessmentPathological information and BI‐RADS features were compared. Random Forest was used to select MRI features, and then four machine learning (ML) algorithms: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), k‐nearest neighbors (k‐NN), and artificial neural nets (ANN), were applied to build models.Statistical TestsChi‐square test, one‐way analysis of variance, and Kruskal–Wallis test were performed. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. For ML models, the generated probability was used to construct the ROC curves.ResultsPeritumoral edema, the presence of multiple lesions and non‐mass enhancement (NME) showed significant differences. For distinguishing HER2‐zero from non‐zero (low + positive), multiple lesions, edema, margin, and tumor size were selected, and the k‐NN model achieved the highest AUC of 0.86 in the training set and 0.79 in the testing set. For differentiating HER2‐low from HER2‐positive, multiple lesions, edema, and margin were selected, and the DT model achieved the highest AUC of 0.79 in the training set and 0.69 in the testing set.Data ConclusionBI‐RADS features read by radiologists from preoperative MRI can be analyzed using more sophisticated feature selection and ML algorithms to build models for the classification of HER2 status and identify HER2‐low.Level of Evidence4.Technical EfficacyStage 2.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献