Integrative clinical transcriptome analysis reveals TMPRSS2‐ERG dependency of prognostic biomarkers in prostate adenocarcinoma

Author:

Gerke Julia S.1,Orth Martin F.1,Tolkach Yuri2,Romero‐Pérez Laura1,Wehweck Fabienne S.1,Stein Stefanie1,Musa Julian1,Knott Maximilian M.L.13,Hölting Tilman L.B.1,Li Jing1,Sannino Giuseppina1,Marchetto Aruna1,Ohmura Shunya1,Cidre‐Aranaz Florencia1,Müller‐Nurasyid Martina456,Strauch Konstantin7,Stief Christian8,Kristiansen Glen2,Kirchner Thomas3910,Buchner Alexander6,Grünewald Thomas G.P.13910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Max‐Eder Research Group for Pediatric Sarcoma Biology Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich Munich Germany

2. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn Bonn Germany

3. Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich Munich Germany

4. Institute of Genetic Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg Germany

5. Chair of Genetic Epidemiology, IBE, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich Munich Germany

6. Department of Internal Medicine I (Cardiology) Hospital of the LMU Munich Munich Germany

7. Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany

8. Urologic Clinic und Polyclinic Clinical Center of the University of Munich Munich Germany

9. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich Munich Germany

10. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg Germany

Abstract

In prostate adenocarcinoma (PCa), distinction between indolent and aggressive disease is challenging. Around 50% of PCa are characterized by TMPRSS2‐ERG (T2E)‐fusion oncoproteins defining two molecular subtypes (T2E‐positive/negative). However, current prognostic tests do not differ between both molecular subtypes, which might affect outcome prediction. To investigate gene‐signatures associated with metastasis in T2E‐positive and T2E‐negative PCa independently, we integrated tumor transcriptomes and clinicopathological data of two cohorts (total n = 783), and analyzed metastasis‐associated gene‐signatures regarding the T2E‐status. Here, we show that the prognostic value of biomarkers in PCa critically depends on the T2E‐status. Using gene‐set enrichment analyses, we uncovered that metastatic T2E‐positive and T2E‐negative PCa are characterized by distinct gene‐signatures. In addition, by testing genes shared by several functional gene‐signatures for their association with event‐free survival in a validation cohort (n = 272), we identified five genes (ASPN, BGN, COL1A1, RRM2 and TYMS)—three of which are included in commercially available prognostic tests—whose high expression was significantly associated with worse outcome exclusively in T2E‐negative PCa. Among these genes, RRM2 and TYMS were validated by immunohistochemistry in another validation cohort (n = 135), and several of them proved to add prognostic information to current clinicopathological predictors, such as Gleason score, exclusively for T2E‐negative patients. No prognostic biomarkers were identified exclusively for T2E‐positive tumors. Collectively, our study discovers that the T2E‐status, which is per se not a strong prognostic biomarker, crucially determines the prognostic value of other biomarkers. Our data suggest that the molecular subtype needs to be considered when applying prognostic biomarkers for outcome prediction in PCa.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Deutsche Krebshilfe

Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung

Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung

Publisher

Wiley

Reference42 articles.

1. Landmarks in prostate cancer

2. Cancer Research UK. Cancer Research UK prostate cancer.2018. Available from:http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/prostate-cancer/survival#heading-Four. Accessed January 14 2018.

3. Effect of Treatment on Quality of Life Among Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

4. Prostate cancer genomics: can we distinguish between indolent and fatal disease using genetic markers? Genome medicine;Wiklund F;BioMed Central,2010

5. Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends—An Update

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3