Misspellings or “miscellings”—Non‐verifiable and unknown cell lines in cancer research publications

Author:

Oste Danielle J.12,Pathmendra Pranujan1,Richardson Reese A. K.3,Johnson Gracen1,Ao Yida1,Arya Maya D.1,Enochs Naomi R.1,Hussein Muhammed1,Kang Jinghan1,Lee Aaron1,Danon Jonathan J.4,Cabanac Guillaume56,Labbé Cyril7,Davis Amanda Capes8,Stoeger Thomas91011,Byrne Jennifer A.112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA

4. School of Chemistry, Faculty of Science The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. IRIT UMR 5505 CNRS University of Toulouse Toulouse France

6. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) Paris France

7. CNRS, Grenoble INP, Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble Université Grenoble Alpes Grenoble France

8. CellBank Australia Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

9. Feinberg School of Medicine in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

10. The Potocsnak Longevity Institute, Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

11. Simpson Querrey Lung Institute for Translational Science Chicago Illinois USA

12. NSW Health Statewide Biobank, NSW Health Pathology Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractReproducible laboratory research relies on correctly identified reagents. We have previously described gene research papers with wrongly identified nucleotide sequence(s), including papers studying miR‐145. Manually verifying reagent identities in 36 recent miR‐145 papers found that 56% and 17% of papers described misidentified nucleotide sequences and cell lines, respectively. We also found 5 cell line identifiers in miR‐145 papers with misidentified nucleotide sequences and cell lines, and 18 cell line identifiers published elsewhere, that did not represent indexed human cell lines. These 23 identifiers were described as non‐verifiable (NV), as their identities were unclear. Studying 420 papers that mentioned 8 NV identifier(s) found 235 papers (56%) that referred to 7 identifiers (BGC‐803, BSG‐803, BSG‐823, GSE‐1, HGC‐7901, HGC‐803, and MGC‐823) as independent cell lines. We could not find any publications describing how these cell lines were established. Six cell lines were sourced from cell line repositories with externally accessible online catalogs, but these cell lines were not indexed as claimed. Some papers also stated that short tandem repeat (STR) profiles had been generated for three cell lines, yet no STR profiles could be identified. In summary, as NV cell lines represent new challenges to research integrity and reproducibility, further investigations are required to clarify their status and identities.

Funder

University of Sydney

Northwestern University

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3