A Critical Examination of the Clinical Diagnosis of Functional Tic‐like Behaviors

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSince the COVID‐19 pandemic, movement disorder clinics have seen an increase in patients with an unusual type of tic‐like symptoms: young adults with abrupt onset complex behaviors. It was quickly suspected that these patients suffered from functional neurological symptoms, later named Functional Tic‐Like Behaviors (FTLB). Subsequent research on the differential diagnosis between FTLB and tics has been substantial and led to the development of diagnostic checklists.ObjectivesWe conducted a theoretical reappraisal of the FTLB literature to clarify the validity of the concept and its diagnostic implications.MethodsThis paper addresses several key aspects of the current FTLB literature: circular reasoning, the complications of the FTLB phenomenology and demographics, the impact of FTLB on tic literature at large, and issues with alignment of the FTLB concept with the diagnostic criteria for functional disorders.ResultsThe clinical approach to FTLB might involve circular reasoning due to a lack of clinical benchmarks. The FTLB phenomenology and demographics may need more work to ensure a lack of bias and a proper description of this patient group including a clear distinction from tics. The impact of the FTLB discussion on the wider literature needs consideration. The validation of positive signs may help with both these endeavors and pave way to the inclusion of FTLB within psychiatric classification systems. Furthermore, the coexistence of FTLB and tics within the same patient needs to be addressed.ConclusionMore research may be needed to fully establish the diagnosis of FTLB and differentiate it from tics.