Accuracy of ultrasound signs on two‐dimensional transvaginal ultrasound in prediction of adenomyosis: prospective multicenter study

Author:

Krentel H.1ORCID,Keckstein J.2ORCID,Füger T.3,Hornung D.4,Theben J.5,Salehin D.6,Buchweitz O.7,Mueller A.8,Schäfer S. D.9ORCID,Sillem M.10,Schweppe K. W.11,Tchartchian G.12,Gilman E.13,De Wilde R. L.14

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology Academic Teaching Hospital, Bethesda Krankenhaus Duisburg Duisburg Germany

2. Endometriosis Clinic, Dres. Keckstein Villach Austria

3. MIC Zentrum München Germany

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Vidia Diakonissenkrankenhaus Karlsruhe Germany

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology St Elisabeth Hospital Köln‐Hohenlind Köln Germany

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda Mönchengladbach Germany

7. Frauenklinik an der Elbe Hamburg Germany

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe Germany

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Münster Münster Germany

10. Praxisklinik am Rosengarten Mannheim and Saarland University Medical Centre Homburg Germany

11. Stiftung Endometrioseforschung Westerstede Germany

12. MIC Clinic Berlin Germany

13. Gilman Biometrics Köln Germany

14. Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology University Hospital for Gynecology, Pius‐Hospital Oldenburg, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTwo‐dimensional (2D) transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is an accessible and cost‐effective diagnostic tool for the detection of adenomyosis. Different ultrasound features related to adenomyosis have been described, but the predictive value of each ultrasound sign and their combinations requires further investigation. We aimed to analyze the accuracy of 2D‐TVS and describe possible combinations of ultrasound signs with a high predictive value in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter study of patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy who had been examined using standardized 2D‐TVS at nine expert centers specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. 2D‐TVS examination included nine typical adenomyosis ultrasound features, comprising heterogeneous myometrium, myometrial linear striations, myometrial cysts, subendometrial microcysts, asymmetrical myometrial thickening, uterine enlargement, the ‘question mark sign’, thickening of the junctional zone and hyperechoic myometrial spots, in order to predict or exclude the presence of adenomyosis. Ultrasound examination results were compared with histology after hysterectomy. The diagnostic reliability of the nine ultrasound signs and their combinations, and the influence of concurrent fibroids on the accuracy of the results, were analyzed.ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled into the study. Histopathological examination revealed adenomyosis in 130 patients (64.4%). The accuracy of prediction of adenomyosis by 2D‐TVS examination using all signs was 63.4% (positive predictive value, 71.5%; negative predictive value, 48.6%; sensitivity, 71.5%; specificity, 48.6%). Heterogeneous myometrium, myometrial cysts, subendometrial microcysts and hyperechoic myometrial spots showed the highest accuracy (55.7–62.1%) as individual ultrasound signs for the prediction of adenomyosis. The combination of the most accurate ultrasound signs (subendometrial microcysts, myometrial cysts and heterogeneous myometrium) improved the specificity of prediction (86.1%) when compared with that of these three single markers (35.2–81.7%). Uterine enlargement and asymmetry showed both low sensitivity (60.8% and 52.3%, respectively) and specificity (41.7% and 49.3%, respectively) as individual sonographic signs.ConclusionsHeterogeneous myometrium, myometrial cysts, subendometrial microcysts and hyperechoic myometrial spots showed the highest accuracy for the detection of adenomyosis in this study, while uterine enlargement and asymmetry led to high false‐positive and false‐negative results. A combination of ultrasound features including the most accurate signs increases specificity. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3